Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Torres (author)
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedily deleted per WP:CSD#G4. (non-admin closure) Mr. Magoo (talk) 14:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Phillip Torres (author) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
I've found no evidence of notability per WP:SCHOLAR, WP:AUTHOR, or WP:GNG. Subject (more widely known as Phil Torres) has certainly been active, but hasn't received significant, independent coverage in reliable sources. 8 peer reviewed articles, and two book published, the latter has received some praise but this article currently cannot become any more than a promotional "about the author" blurb at best, and currently seems at least WP:TOOSOON for an encyclopedia entry.
Note, there was an AFD in 2007 for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Torres, which may or may not be the same subject. --Animalparty! (talk) 18:28, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 21:46, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Delete non-notable writer.John Pack Lambert (talk) 22:38, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- See also previous deletion discussion: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Torres (author) from earlier this year. LadyofShalott 23:30, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. --Animalparty! (talk) 04:06, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- speedied as G4 - this is a straight-up recreation of the text deleted in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phil Torres (author), and speedied after another recreation. This is also the same person (though different article text) deleted at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Phillip Torres, which many of the "delete" voters found so implausible they wondered if it was a hoax. I've also salted all three titles. Also his alias Philippe Verdoux. What are the appropriate warnings for someone who keeps creating and recreating an AFDed article? - David Gerard (talk) 09:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.